No debate on climate changes and Copenhagen meeting in 8a.nu? Well the meeting is over, so I have a comment about what I define the human intraspecific war. 400 million indians said something obvious: it is impossible switch off the light you have not. An ecological translation of this fact is that the human ecology is part of planet ecology. The rich white human of the west atlantic countries works, as winning part of his species, to change a basic rule of the life: the adaptation to the environment. He tries to adapte the environment to his own needs. But the evolution does not play the same game. Modern technology and wellness in west countries reduced the human adaptation with health protection and reducing the number of generations/century (most of money used for increase the life span over biological need and depletion of youth work and reproductive chances). The costs of this trend are paid by the socalled loosers, africans and east countries populations, which have unconsciously a strong adaptation, by disease pressure, intraethnic wars, 5-6 generations/century. They will win...at the end..in the human intraspecific contest. The white atlantic man is collapsing his life on the planet, not the life of others which are every day in war for survive nor the life of other species used in the battle for selection. The rich white man wants a profitfull steady state: it will be his unglorious end, the nature will not permit. More in http://www.camurrilamberto.it
In the 8a yearbook of 2006, we dedicated the inside back cover to discuss "Producer Responsibility" and "Consumer Responsibility" in regards to Climate change. Among other things we published to climbing pictures in snow and near the water with these questions and text. "Will climbing in snowcovered lanscapes be possible with continued global warming?" "Increasing sea level due to melting polar ices will lead to land reductions."
Climate changes